Firm Fined for Violations Regarding Use of Social Media Influencer Program
RIAs
Social Media
May 31, 2024
The Case
FINRA announced that it fined a firm $850,000 for social media posts made by influencers on the firm’s behalf that were not fair or balanced or contained exaggerated, unwarranted, promissory, or misleading claims.
The censure also highlighted that the firm failed to have a reasonable system, including written procedures, for supervising the communications that the firm’s influencers made on its behalf, in violating both FINRA and SEC rules.
Why Does This Matter?
This case arises from FINRA’s examination of firm practices regarding customer acquisition via social media channels. It represents the first formal FINRA disciplinary action involving a firm’s supervision of social media influencers.
InnReg's Experience
InnReg has over a decade of experience developing effective supervisory frameworks for fintechs based on a systematic approach to identifying risks, implementing effective controls, and enhancing internal documentation to reduce regulatory burdens. InnReg’s compliance consulting services empower fintechs to enhance policies, processes, and technologies for e-communications compliance.
Learn More About This Topic
For additional details, read InnReg’s leading-edge perspective on financial advertising compliance, which provides financial innovators with a summary of the latest FTC and SEC regulations, as well as key insights on the impact of compliance programs on digital marketing.
Blockchain
On December 30, 2024, the US Department of the Treasury and the IRS issued final regulations focused on decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms and their role in digital asset transactions.
RIAs
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced charges against nine investment advisors and three broker-dealers for failures by the firms and their personnel to maintain and preserve electronic communications in violation of recordkeeping provisions of the federal securities laws.
RIAs
The SEC’s order finds that, from at least October 2018 until January 2022, an investment advisory firm stated in its offering materials and other documents provided to prospective and existing private fund investors that it was voluntarily complying with AML due diligence laws despite those laws not applying to investment advisors.
