Contents
Choosing between an RIA vs. broker-dealer model is an important decision for financial professionals and investors alike. While both guide clients toward achieving financial goals, they differ in regulatory standards, compensation models, and client responsibilities.
This guide explores the key differences between RIAs and broker-dealers, highlighting how each operates within the financial industry.
Whether you’re a professional evaluating your career path or an investor seeking the right advisor, understanding these distinctions will help you make an informed decision.
See also:
InnReg is a global regulatory compliance and operations consulting team serving financial services companies since 2013. If you need assistance with compliance or fintech regulations, click here.
RIA vs. Broker-Dealer: Core Differences
Here are the key factors that set RIAs and broker-dealers apart:
Regulatory Frameworks and Standards
The regulatory frameworks governing RIAs and broker-dealers set the foundation for their roles in the financial industry.
RIAs with assets under management (AUM) exceeding $100 million must register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), though certain exceptions apply. RIAs managing less than $100 million typically register with state securities regulators unless they meet specific criteria (e.g., having clients in multiple states, which could trigger SEC registration).
They must abide by strict compliance standards from both the SEC and state authorities, including regular Form ADV updates, conflict disclosures, and rigorous record-keeping.
Broker-dealers, on the other hand, are primarily regulated by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and the SEC.
FINRA oversees broker-dealer registration, examinations, and compliance with industry rules. This includes monitoring sales practices, customer interactions, and adherence to Anti-Money Laundering (AML) protocols.
Broker-dealers must also register their firms and representatives with the SEC and meet additional licensing requirements at the state level.
Regarding governance, RIAs are under the authority of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, which established the fiduciary duty requiring RIAs to act in the best interests of their clients. Broker-dealers operate under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which sets forth rules for market integrity and the suitability standard.
Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 and Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) have added layers of oversight to ensure transparency and client protection in both models.
Fiduciary vs. Suitability Obligations
RIAs are held to a fiduciary standard, which requires them to act in their clients’ best interests at all times.
This obligation extends to providing unbiased advice, disclosing all conflicts of interest, and prioritizing the client’s financial goals above any personal or firm incentives. For example, an RIA recommending an investment must ensure it aligns with the client’s objectives, even if it means forgoing opportunities for higher compensation.
Broker-dealers operate under a suitability standard governed by FINRA Rule 2111. While they must recommend products suitable for a client’s needs and financial situation, they are not required to choose options that are necessarily the best for the client.
For instance, a broker-dealer may suggest an investment product that meets the client’s risk tolerance and goals but offers a higher commission for the broker.
In 2020, the SEC introduced Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which imposes additional obligations on broker-dealers when making recommendations to retail customers. Reg BI requires broker-dealers to:
Act in the best interest of the retail customer at the time of the recommendation.
Address and mitigate conflicts of interest (e.g., commissions or incentives).
Provide more transparency about fees, costs, and risks.
However, Reg BI does not elevate broker-dealers to a fiduciary standard, meaning they are still not required to place the client’s interests above their own in all circumstances.
Compensation Models for RIAs and Broker-Dealers
One of the most noticeable differences between RIAs vs. broker-dealers is how they earn their income. RIAs typically use fee-only or fee-based compensation models.
In a fee-only arrangement, RIAs charge clients a percentage of assets under management, hourly fees, or flat rates for their advisory services.
In a fee-based model, RIAs may also earn additional compensation through commissions on certain products, though they must still disclose and mitigate conflicts under their fiduciary duty.
Broker-dealers, however, primarily rely on commission-based earnings. They earn revenue by selling financial products such as mutual funds, stocks, or annuities. Each transaction generates a commission, which can vary based on the product type and the agreement with the issuing financial institution.
In recent years, hybrid models have become increasingly popular. Some financial professionals operate as both RIAs and broker-dealers, allowing them to provide fee-based advisory services while also earning commissions for product sales.
This hybrid approach can offer clients greater flexibility but requires careful management of conflicts of interest to maintain trust and regulatory compliance.
Client Relationship Dynamics
The nature of client relationships differs significantly between RIAs and broker-dealers, reflecting their distinct roles in the financial services industry.
RIAs typically build long-term relationships with their clients by offering ongoing, personalized financial planning and investment management services.
They prioritize a holistic approach, focusing on their clients’ overall financial well-being rather than individual transactions. This often involves continuous monitoring and adjustment of financial strategies to align with evolving client goals, making RIAs trusted partners in wealth management.
Broker-dealers, on the other hand, operate in a more transactional capacity. Their primary role is to facilitate the buying and selling of financial products.
While broker-dealers may provide recommendations, their client interactions are often limited to specific transactions or short-term objectives. This model suits clients seeking assistance with individual investments rather than comprehensive financial guidance.
Ultimately, the choice between working with an RIA vs. a broker-dealer often depends on the client’s financial needs and preferences.
Clients seeking ongoing advisory support and a relationship built on trust gravitate toward RIAs, while those needing transactional services find broker-dealers to be a better fit.
Conflicts of Interest
Since RIAs are required to act as fiduciaries, they must avoid or fully disclose any potential conflicts.
For example, if an RIA stands to gain indirectly from recommending a particular investment, it must clearly communicate this to the client and explain why it aligns with the client’s goals.
Their fee-only compensation model further minimizes conflicts by eliminating commission-based incentives tied to specific products.
The suitability standard that broker-dealers operate under does not eliminate conflicts but mainly requires that recommended products suit the client’s financial circumstances.
Their commission-based earnings model also creates inherent conflicts, as brokers may be incentivized to recommend products with higher payouts.
Licensing and Registration Requirements
Both RIAs and broker-dealers must navigate distinct licensing and registration processes to operate legally and meet regulatory standards. While RIAs focus on advisory qualifications and disclosure filings, broker-dealers must adhere to stringent FINRA and SEC requirements.
Here’s a brief overview of what each path entails.
See also:
Steps to Becoming an RIA
To become an RIA, individuals or firms must register with the appropriate regulatory body. Filing Form ADV is a critical part of this process, as it outlines the RIA’s business, fees, and potential conflicts of interest.
Additionally, passing the Series 65 exam (or equivalent qualifications) is often required to demonstrate industry knowledge and compliance.
Need help with RIA compliance?
Fill out the form below and our experts will get back to you.
Broker-Dealer Licensing Overview
Becoming a broker-dealer involves registering with the SEC and obtaining membership with FINRA.
Firms must file Form BD to initiate the registration process and comply with FINRA’s New Membership Application (NMA) requirements, which include financial reviews, establishing supervisory systems, and meeting net capital requirements.
Individual representatives must also pass licensing exams, such as the Series 7, to qualify for trading and advisory roles.
Compliance and Oversight
While both RIA and broker-dealer models are heavily regulated, their compliance obligations differ significantly based on their business models and regulatory oversight.
Key Compliance Obligations for RIAs
RIAs’ compliance responsibilities include:
Filing and Maintaining Form ADV: RIAs must disclose key details about their business, fees, services, and potential conflicts of interest. Annual updates are required to ensure transparency.
Establishing and Testing a Compliance Program: SEC Rule 206(4)-7 mandates that RIAs adopt written policies and procedures, designate a Chief Compliance Officer (CCO), and regularly review the program for effectiveness.
Books and Records Requirements: RIAs must maintain detailed documentation of client communications, financial transactions, and investment decisions as per SEC Rule 204-2. These records are critical during audits or examinations.
Code of Ethics: RIAs must establish and enforce a code of ethics that outlines acceptable practices, particularly around insider trading and personal trading activity.
Broker-Dealer Compliance Standards
Broker-dealers focus on transactional integrity and maintaining fair market practices. Their key obligations include:
Supervisory Systems and WSPs: Broker-dealers must implement comprehensive supervisory controls under FINRA Rule 3110. Written Supervisory Procedures (WSPs) ensure that representatives comply with regulatory requirements.
AML Compliance: Under the Bank Secrecy Act and FINRA Rule 3310, firms are required to implement AML programs, file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs), and verify customer identities.
Reg BI: Broker-dealers must recommend securities in the best interest of retail customers, prioritizing transparency and suitability.
Record-Keeping and Trade Reporting: Broker-dealers must maintain detailed records of trades, customer transactions, and communications under SEC Rule 17a-3 and Rule 17a-4. FINRA rules also require accurate and timely trade reporting.
Additional Considerations for Compliance
Penalties for Non-Compliance: Both RIAs and broker-dealers face severe consequences for failing to meet compliance standards, including fines, license revocation, reputational damage, or even criminal charges in cases of fraud or negligence.
Ongoing Training Requirements: Regular training is mandatory for both RIAs and broker-dealers to ensure that employees stay informed about evolving regulations, such as Reg BI updates or new SEC guidance. These programs are crucial for fostering a culture of compliance.
Cybersecurity Obligations: As cyber threats continue to rise, the SEC and FINRA emphasize the importance of cybersecurity. Both RIAs and broker-dealers must implement measures, including secure access controls, data encryption, regular vulnerability assessments, and comprehensive incident response plans.
RIA vs. Broker-Dealer: Pros and Cons
Deciding between an RIA and a broker-dealer involves weighing the benefits and challenges of each. Both options cater to distinct business approaches and client needs, so aligning your choice with your professional goals is essential.
See also:
RIAs
Benefits of RIAs
Fiduciary Standard: RIAs must act in their clients’ best interests, fostering trust and building long-term relationships.
Transparent Revenue Models: Fee-only or fee-based compensation reduces conflicts of interest, offering clients greater confidence in their advisor’s recommendations.
Holistic Financial Services: RIAs often provide comprehensive financial planning, tailored investment strategies, and ongoing portfolio management, making them ideal for clients with complex needs.
Flexibility and Independence: RIAs can operate independently, allowing greater control over business practices and client engagement.
Challenges of RIAs
Compliance Burden: Meeting SEC or state regulatory requirements involves extensive reporting and ongoing oversight.
Revenue Growth: Fee-only models may require time to build a steady client base, particularly for new advisors.
Broker-Dealers
Benefits of Broker-Dealers
Diverse Revenue Opportunities: Commission-based earnings can generate significant income, particularly with frequent trades or high-value products.
Broad Product Access: Broker-dealers can offer a wide range of financial products, including mutual funds, annuities, and insurance, to meet various client needs.
Transactional Focus: For clients seeking specific products or one-off transactions, broker-dealers provide a straightforward solution.
Support Systems: Affiliated broker-dealers often offer compliance and operational support, reducing the administrative burden on individual representatives.
Challenges of Broker-Dealers
Potential Conflicts of Interest: Commission-based compensation may incentivize product sales over unbiased recommendations.
Intensive Oversight: Broker-dealers must comply with stringent FINRA rules, including supervisory requirements and anti-money laundering protocols.
FAQs About RIAs and Broker-Dealers
Can a financial professional operate as both an RIA and a broker-dealer?
Yes, financial professionals can operate as both an RIA and a broker-dealer through a hybrid model. In this setup, they can provide fee-based advisory services under their RIA designation while also earning commissions for selling financial products as broker-dealer representatives. This dual approach offers flexibility but requires compliance with both fiduciary and suitability standards, as well as careful management of potential conflicts of interest.
Is it easier to start as an RIA or a broker-dealer?
Starting as an RIA is generally less complex and costly. RIAs primarily need to register with the SEC or state securities regulators, pass the Series 65 exam (or equivalent), and establish a compliance program. Broker-dealers face additional requirements, such as FINRA membership, net capital minimums, and the creation of robust supervisory systems, making it a more resource-intensive process.
How do RIAs and broker-dealers disclose conflicts of interest?
RIAs are required to disclose conflicts of interest clearly in Form ADV, particularly in Part 2A, which is shared with clients. They must also take steps to mitigate these conflicts in accordance with their fiduciary duty. Broker-dealers, regulated by FINRA, disclose conflicts of interest through trade confirmations, prospectuses, or other required client communications. Reg BI further mandates that broker-dealers act in the best interest of their retail clients, though the suitability standard still applies.
Do RIAs and broker-dealers have different liability risks?
Yes, RIAs typically face higher liability risks because they operate under the fiduciary standard, which holds them to a higher legal duty of care. Any failure to act in the client’s best interest can result in significant legal and financial repercussions. Broker-dealers, governed by the suitability standard, have less stringent obligations, which may result in lower liability exposure. However, they can still face penalties for failing to meet regulatory requirements or conflicts of interest that harm clients.
Choosing between the RIA and broker-dealer models is a critical decision for financial professionals.
Your decision should align with your business goals, preferred revenue model, and comfort with regulatory obligations. Keep in mind that RIAs emphasize independence and client-centric planning, while broker-dealers focus on sales efficiency and diverse product offerings. Both paths require a strong commitment to compliance, transparency, and client value.
How Can InnReg Help?
InnReg is a global regulatory compliance and operations consulting team serving financial services companies since 2013.
We are especially effective at launching and scaling fintechs with innovative compliance strategies and delivering cost-effective managed services, assisted by proprietary regtech solutions.
If you need help with RIA compliance, reach out to our regulatory experts today:
Published on Jan 6, 2025
Last updated on Jan 6, 2025
